【新唐人2011年3月24日訊】多國部隊仍在繼續對利比亞進行空襲行動。獨裁狂人卡扎菲公開表示，要頑抗到底。中共則以更激烈的言詞，來抨擊國際社會對利比亞實施空中打擊。不過，中共在聯合國安理會表決空襲利比亞時，並沒有投出否決票。在國際社會上前後表現矛盾的中共，究竟是為了甚麽呢？
23號清晨，利比亞首都的黎波里響起爆炸和防空炮火的聲音。此前幾個小時，卡扎菲在的黎波里的住所處公開露面，對他的支持者說，利比亞絕不屈服於西方，並已經做好戰爭準備，不管時間是長是短。這是卡扎菲自3月15號以來首次公開露面。
另外，美、法、英領導人達成共識，同意北約組織應在指揮對利比亞軍事行動中扮演關鍵角色。與此同時，卡扎菲的部隊與反抗軍在利比亞西部地區多座城市持續爆發激烈戰鬥。
而中共仍然持續此前批評聯軍的態度，對聯軍空襲利比亞的抨擊之聲更為鋪天蓋地。
23號的《環球時報》社評文章《別踢國際政治的“烏龍球”》，針對大陸某著名網站發起的“人權高於主權”的討論，進行了批評，指責他們是在國際政治的博弈中踢“烏龍球”。
《人民日報》則針對在聯合國安理會通過1973決議起關鍵作用的法國總統薩爾克奇，進行了猛烈抨擊。
實際上，中共在聯合國安理會投票表決時完全可以否決空襲利比亞，這樣1973決議就不會通過。但中共卻採取了棄權方式，這等於是為國際社會對利比亞進行空襲開了綠燈。
中共前後立場，為甚麼會自相矛盾呢？
時事評論員陳破空認為，中共批評和譴責多國部隊轟炸利比亞，是出於國內政治的需要。陳破空分析，按照國際社會這一次的行事標準，早在1989年天安門屠城時，國際社會就應該出手阻止中共的暴行了。中共擔心，當同樣事件重演於中國時，國際社會或許可以“補上這一課”了。
不過，讓中共恐懼的也許還不僅僅如此。
就在國際社會對利比亞進行軍事干預的同時，對卡扎菲的國際司法調查也早已開始。這次的 1973號決議之前，安理會就已通過了1970號決議，其中包括以涉嫌“反人類罪”將利比亞當局鎮壓平民的行動，提交海牙國際刑事法庭進行處理。
89學運領袖王丹撰文指出，如果最終卡扎菲被送上海牙國際法庭，內心最感到震撼的，就是中共領導人了。
《法國國際廣播電臺》引述王丹文章說，中國大規模的抗議早晚會發生。到那個時候，中共領導人就要面臨一個選擇：與人民對話，還是用武力鎮壓？
到目前為止，海牙國際刑事法庭的檢控官已經宣佈，針對卡扎菲的司法調查可能將在今年五月完畢。
海牙國際刑事法庭是二戰後紐倫堡審判的產物。過去已經有前南斯拉夫領導人和蘇丹政府官員在法庭受審判決的案例。這個法庭的設立，是對所有運用武力鎮壓自己人民的暴君的嚴重警告，是懸在他們頭上的達摩克利斯之劍。
新唐人記者李靜、黎安安綜合報導。
China Against Libya』s Air Strikes
As the UN coalition continues its air strikes in Libya,
dictator Gadhafi publicly vowed to fight to the end.
The Chinese government criticizes strongly
the UN coalition air strikes against the Libyan ruler.
China didn』t veto Libya』s air strikes resolution
at the UN Security Council
Why is the Chinese government belying itself?
In the morning of March 23, in Libya』s capital Tripoli,
were heard sounds of explosions and artilleries.
Several hours earlier, at his residence in Tripoli,
Gadhafi appeared before its supporters
to say that Libya would not bow to the West,
and preparations for war have been made.
This is Gadhafi』s 1st public appearance
since March 15.
Leaders of U.S., France and UK
reached a consensus that NATO should play
a key role in the military actions.
Currently, Gadhafi's forces and Libyan rebels are
having fierce battles in several cities in Libya.
Chinese regime continues its overwhelming criticism
of the coalition and the air strikes.
On March 23, Chinese Communist Party (CCP)』s
Newspaper, Global Times, published the editorial:
"Do not make own political goals international".
It criticized discussions posted
on a well-known Chinese site about the topic
“human rights are above sovereignty”,
and accusing them in playing "own goals”
in international politics.
CCP』s People's Daily attacked
the French President Nicola Sarkozy, who played
a critical role in approving UN Resolution 1973.
The CCP could have vetoed the UN Resolution.
Instead, the Chinese government abstained,
giving green light to coalition air strikes in Libya.
Why is the Chinese government contradicting itself?
Current Issues commentator, Chen Pokong,
believes CCP』s criticism and condemnation
of the bombing comes from its political needs.
Using their current actions as standards,
the world should have stopped CCP's atrocities
on Tiananmen Massacre. Beijing is worried
that when similar incidents occur again,
the international community may not tolerate it.
There is more for the CCP to fear, however.
Besides the military intervention in Libya,
the international community also started
an international judicial inquiry on Gadhafi.
The UN Security Council』s Resolution 1970 includes
the submission of Gadhafi』s
"crimes against humanity"
to the International Criminal Tribunal in Hague.
Wang Dan, a student leader of 1989 movements,
wrote that if Gadhafi is finally sent
to International Court,
the CCP』s leaders will be most shaken.
Radio France Internationale cited Wang』s article,
sooner or later, large-scale protests will take place.
By that time, CCP leaders will face a choice:
dialogue with people, or use force to suppress them?
The International Criminal Tribunal prosecutor
announced, that a judicial investigation of Gadhafi
might be undertaken in May 2011.
The International Criminal Court in the Hague
was establishe for the Nuremberg trials after WWII.
Some former Yugoslavian leaders and
Sudanese government officials were tried there.
The establishment of the court is a serious warning
to tyrants who suppress their people by force.
It is a Damocles Sword, hanging over their heads.
NTD reporters Li Jing and Li Anan
