【禁聞】批“穿越劇” 大陸影視再向左

【新唐人2011年4月19日訊】重慶官方重點打造的所謂“省級第一紅色頻道”——重慶衛視，在改組為“紅色頻道”之後，收視率大跌，被迫採用裁員降薪的方式來度過難關。而目前風靡大陸、收視率高的“穿越劇”和“神怪劇”，卻遭官方禁止。外媒評論指出，中共禁拍“時間穿越劇”是“避免有人重寫歷史”，大陸的影視業繼續向左偏離。

大陸廣電總局不久前下發《通知》，對全國的電視劇進行總結，而近年盛行以穿越時空、古裝神話大行其道的「穿越劇」遭到批評，《通知》批評這些劇目：歪曲歷史，隨意編纂神話故事，渲染封建迷信、宿命論和輪迴轉世，價值取向含混。

據了解，今年春天，「湖南衛視」播出的穿越劇：《宮》，取得很好的收視率，不少製作單位相繼跟進，“穿越劇”一時風靡大陸影視界，深獲觀眾認可。

北京的文化學者、資深媒體人淩滄洲認為，廣電局應該在憲法的原則下對行業進行指導。他對《美國之音》表示，總體感覺中國影視螢幕目前比較單調，宣傳所謂中共“主旋律”的“血雨腥風”比較多，缺乏多元化的聲音。

他對廣電總局的做法提出質疑，他說，如果拍攝的穿越劇既不低俗、也不違反社會功德和侵犯別人的權益，為甚麼不可以拍呢？

一名大陸網友 [mgzazbb] 回應說：寫遊記說我洩露機密，寫歷史說我借古諷今，寫戰爭說我扯動謀反，寫神怪故事說我宣揚迷信，寫名人傳記又說我污蔑領導....

此前，廣電總局電視劇管理司司長還表示，短期內禁止對四大名著進行翻拍，也不能簡單「克隆」國外劇碼。

美國喬治梅•森大學的客座教授章天亮博士認為，影視作品，能夠對人的思想理念起到潛移默化的作用，中共害怕。

章天亮（美國喬治梅•森大學客座教授）：“一些宣傳正統觀念的古典名著啊，它也是相信有神論的，那麼，對於中共這樣一個無神論的政黨，它害怕這樣的影視作品。”

《好萊塢報導》(The Hollywood Reporter)引述影評人士、記者周黎明(Raymond Zhou Liming)的話說，人們更多的是借用穿越劇來影射評論當今時事。

英國《每日郵報》則刊文指出，中國禁止拍攝時間穿越影視劇，是“避免有人重寫歷史”。

《美國之音》認為，這標誌著大陸的影視業繼續向左轉，意識形態不斷收緊。

而廣電總局的通知更是明確要求，各級電視臺積極籌備，努力推出一批為中共建黨90週年“獻禮”的影視作品。

高瑜（國內資深媒體人）：“今年呢，就是要收緊所有的輿論，現在簡直就是有點恢復毛澤東時代的那種宣傳口徑，反對國民黨的、打國民黨的、打日本的可以演。”

民眾認為，這樣的文革式洗腦節目並不符合觀眾的口味，而且有“譁眾取寵”之嫌。

新唐人記者李謙、黃容綜合報導。

China TV and Film Go More Left

Anchor:

Chongqing authorities』 key effort to reintroduce

Chongqing Satellite TV as "First Red Channel

of the Province" resulted in a rating slump, layoff

and pay cuts. 『Time-Travel』 and 『Spirit-Themed』

dramas with high ratings in China were banned

by authorities. Foreign media said the CCP』s

(Chinese Communist Party) ban "prevents people

from rewriting history." Despite this, the film

and TV industry in China continues to go left.

Mainland China』s State Administration of Radio,

Film and Television (SARFT) recently issued

a "notice." It criticized popular 『Time-Travel』 drama

about legends and travel through history and space:

“Warp history & legend, promote feudal superstition,

fatalism, reincarnation, and ambiguous values.”

Accordingly, Hunan Satellite TV』s Palace received

very good ratings this spring. Many producers

followed suit. 『Time-Travel』 dramas are popular

in the Mainland film and television industry.

Beijing scholar and senior media professional

Ling Cangzhou thinks SARFT should guide

the industry based on the constitution. He told VOA

he feels China』s film and TV programs are dull,

lack various factors, and many of them

promote CCP』s theme of revolutionary violence.

He directed his doubts to SARFT: “Why can』t we

produce 『Time-Travel』 dramas that are not vulgar,

neither against social morality and other』s rights?”

The Chinese netizen “mgzazbb” commented:

“My travel stories are labeled as

disclosing national secrets, history stories as

alluding the present with history, war stories

as rebellious, fantasy stories as superstitious,

and biographies as slandering the leadership…”

Head of SARFT expressed that adaptations

of the four classic novels and overseas dramas

are not allowed in the short term.

Visiting professor at George Mason University,

Zhang Tianlang thinks that CCP fears film and TV

works』 gradual impact on people』s thoughts.

Zhang Tianliang: “Some classic novels are about

traditional values and people』s belief in gods;

this is why the atheistic CCP bans such works."

The Hollywood Reporter quoted media analyst

and reporter Raymond Zhou Liming, that people

allude to current events with 『Time-Travel』 dramas.

VOA thinks China』s ban on “Time-Travel” drama

signals CCP』s tightening on ideology and

China』s film and TV industry continuing to go left.

SARFT clearly requires TV stations at all levels to

actively prepare “Presents” for CCP』s 90th birthday.

Senior Mainland media professional Gao Yu:

"This year is to tighten all media. Its like Mao』s era.

Programs about wars against Kuomintang

and Japanese are allowed.”

People believe that the Cultural Revolution-style

brainwashing programs do not meet audience's taste.

NTD reporters Liqian and Huang Rong