【禁聞】《建黨偉業》起反效 激勵反獨裁

【新唐人2011年6月17日訊】雲集眾多明星，為中共建黨九十週年製作的電影《建黨偉業》這星期開始在影院放映。雖然各大視頻網站熱烈炒作這部影片，但是卻不允許網友評論和打分。有網友開玩笑說，《建黨偉業》具有強烈的現實意義，講述了一個腐敗獨裁的政府終將被熱血青年推翻的故事。學者評論這部影片構成對中共政權的莫大諷刺。

在大陸的一家電影、音樂愛好者的視頻權威網站----《豆瓣網》上，《建黨偉業》被放在熱門電影推薦位置，卻不能像其他電影那樣顯示評分和評論。而在另一個熱門影評網站《時光網》，網民也無法對這部影片發表觀感。

大陸詩人和文化評論家葉匡政分析，很可能是因為民眾打分打得太低了，或者給了很多太差的評論，所以網站出於自我保護的考慮不得不作此限制。

但是網友們卻抑制不住的掀起笑看《建黨偉業》的熱潮。網友笑稱這部電影具有強烈的現實意義。有人說，《建黨偉業》是一部勵志片，它講述了一個腐敗獨裁的政府，終將被熱血青年推翻的故事。

法律文化學者，「中國律師觀察網」主編趙國君表示，對於普通觀眾，《建黨偉業》唯一的賣點和噱頭，就是眾多偶像明星的大集合。但是在知識精英眼中，這部影片起到的是為黨歌功頌德的反效果。

趙國君（「中國律師觀察網」主編）：「在有識之士那裏， 顯然這部片子拍錯了時候。因為片中的歷史情景和今天極為相似。這一點很容易引起有識之士的豐富聯想，也構成對現政權的莫大諷刺。」

葉匡政指出，中共一開始建黨的時候，宣稱革命的目地是為了實現中國民主化。但是今天中共在言論結社自由方面，比國民黨控制的更加嚴格。

葉匡政（大陸詩人 文化評論家）：「因為中共在建黨時的允諾，和我們今天在中國現實中看到的景象，他在某種程度上出現了一種背離，那麼越是對歷史進行回顧，可能越能喚起民眾的政治意識。所以我覺得如果大陸民眾能夠從這個角度來看這個電影，也是很有價值的。」

從影片“建國大業”到“建黨偉業”，導演利用偶像明星的華麗外表和小說式的戲劇化情節，來包裝紅色主旋律的作品。趙國君表示，從電影專業角度上來說，影片類型模糊不清，不知道該歸為記錄片、歷史片還是故事片？

趙國君：「明星百分之八十的是投機，百分之二十的是內心恐懼不知怎麼說，百分之四十的是無腦，整個是一大哄。第四個，票房是假的。他不是市場賣票。他組織觀看，組織觀看花的又是納稅人的錢。左口袋進了右口袋。從電影本身角度來說，是個怪胎，是個畸形，啥都不是。可以說在電影史上應該是個笑柄。」

葉匡政也指出，中共當年成立的歷史，並不像電影裡描寫的。其實中共當年建黨的歷史跟蘇共有非常大的關聯，包括共產國際的指導和經費的資助。所以拍《建黨偉業》應該從共產國際和蘇共開始談，那才是一個真實的歷史。

有人說，看完《建黨偉業》預告片，心中有一種建黨的衝動與豪情。建議所有青年都該看看這片子，學學片子裡的青年人是怎麼和腐敗強權鬥爭的，學學他們是怎麼示威的，學學他們的熱血，學習他們是怎麼建黨的。

也有網友說，能在電影院裡一起高呼“結束一黨專制”的臺詞，也蠻來勁的。

新唐人記者秦雪、周平採訪報導。

CCP Film Impels Anti-Dictatorship Movement

Film “The Founding of a Party” features many stars.

It premiers this week as a tribute to 90th anniversary

of the founding of Chinese Communist Party(CCP).

Major video sites enthusiastically hype up the film,

but netizens are prohibited from commenting on it.

Some said that this film is quite significant for

showing passionate youth overthrowing a dictatorship.

Scholars said that it is a huge mockery of CCP』s rule.

The film has been placed in the popular film section

of Douban, a website for Chinese film and music fans.

However, netizens are forbidden to comment on it.

On another popular film critic website,

netizens encounter the same problem.

Ye Kuangzheng, a poet and cultural critic, said

that probably due to netizens' low ratings and

unfavorable remarks of this film,

these websites disallow comments, for self-protection.

Netizens jokingly said that this film has a strong

practical significance. Some say it is inspirational,

as it shows how passionate young people overthrew

a corrupt authoritarian government.

Zhao Guojun, legal culture scholar and chief editor

of "Chinese Lawyers Observation Network",

concluded that the general audience come to watch it

for the huge gathering of many movie stars.

The intellectual elite see the film』s negative effects

of praising the CCP.

Zhao: To the intellectuals, obviously,

the timing of this film is wrong,

as there is strong similarity between the

historical setting in the film and the current situation.

This can easily stimulate intellectuals』 imagination

and also constitutes a mockery of the current regime.

Ye KuangZheng said that that at the beginning,

CCP claimed that the purpose of its revolution was

to achieve democracy for the Chinese people.

However, speech is more stringently controlled

by the CCP than by the Kuomintang (KMT).

Ye: The promise made by CCP at its founding shows

a departure from the reality in China today.

Therefore, by reflecting on the history,

people are likely to awaken their political awareness.

I believe that if Chinese people can watch the film

from this perspective, this film is quite valuable.

From "The Founding of a Republic" to

"The Founding of a Party", the directors have used

movie stars and drama to package the communist films.

Zhao Guojun said that from the professional viewpoint,

the films』 genre is pretty ambiguous.

Are they documentaries, historical films or feature films?

Zhao Guojun: About 80% of stars are speculative,

20% are fearful, and 40% are brainless. It's a big coax.

The box office is also fabricated, as it didn』t sell tickets.

Instead, group viewings have been organized.

The group viewings are at the expense of the taxpayers.

From the perspective of the film, it is a freak, an oaf,

and a laughing stock in the history of cinema.

Ye also noted that the history of CCP's founding

is not the one described in the film.

The CCP had close ties with Soviet Union,

which provided guidance and funding.

Thus, for a true historical film, it should start from

Communist Internal and the Soviet Union.

Someone said, after watching the previews of the film,

he was inspired. He recommended that all youth

to watch this film and learn how to protest,

to be passionate and to start a political party.

Another said that shouting together in the theater

“End one-party dictatorship” was very exciting.

NTD reporters Qin Xue and Zhou Ping