【新唐人2011年6月27日訊】中紀委副書記吳玉良日前表示,中國當前要實踐「官員財產公示制度」條件還不成熟。為何被全世界公認為「陽光法案、終極反腐」的「官員財產公開」,在中國卻難產呢?學者認為,不是做不到,而是自欺欺人。
吳玉良在通報倡廉反腐的情況時表示,中國現在對官員的財產公示條件,因為「社會誠信體系」和「資訊統計體系,這兩個條件有欠缺,有關部門無法查詢和統計,因此很難發揮作用。
中國問題專家程曉農指出,上海市前幾年要求公務員申報所擁有的住房,並聲稱只要申報了就既往不究,顯示中共並非掌握不了數據,而是不願意做。
中國問題專家 程曉農: “實際上現在沒有統計的原因是政府不願意統計,結果他把沒有統計說成是不能監督的原因,如果政府真要監督的話, 其實很簡單, 政府拿出他維穩的頸頭,利用他維穩的系統,這些監控異議人士的手段, 如果用來監控官員 我不相信查不出官員的財產。”
針對吳玉良聲稱官員財產公示欠缺條件,而迴避官員財產公示的說法,香港《東方日報》「神州觀察」欄目評論指出:按照中紀委的說法,在中國推行「陽光法案」必須有條件,但事實上這些條件在任何國家任何時候都可能欠缺,為甚麼世界上大多數國家和地區包括像墨西哥、泰國等欠發達國家,都可以無條件實行反腐制度,唯獨中國不可行呢?
程曉農:“只要他把身份證號全國統一的登記,那麼很快的銀行存款所有人的名字就查清楚了,中國可以用身份證監控異議人士,說明他現在早就可以做到利用身份證監控他想監控的人, 所以從技術上來講並沒有任何困難。”
《東方日報》這篇《財產公示難產 官府自欺欺人》的評論文章認為,不就是因為社會誠信蕩然無存,官場貪腐無度嗎? 吳玉良聲稱「社會誠信體系」是官員財產公示的先決條件,完全是本末倒置的邏輯,根本站不住腳。
而「所謂缺乏訊息統計體系,更不值一駁。推行「陽光法案」,只須建立一個數據庫,讓官員自行申報,這對已經掌握衞星、高鐵技術的中國來說,根本是輕而易舉的事。」
中國問題專家 程曉農: “他不願意去監控官員,當然中國永遠不具備對官員腐敗的統計或者監控。實際上政府各有關部門它們只關心一件事,怎麼維護共產黨的統治,怎麼維護官員的特權, 當然它們就不願意採取任何監控官員的手段。”
因此,程曉農認為,在中國「倡廉」這兩字是假的。因為如果政府真的反腐的話,很容易就可以根據現在的監控系統,把官員的財產、房子、存款查得一清二楚。
事實上,官員財產申報制度在內地已推行多年,但始終形同虛設,《東方日報》說,沒有一名貪官因為財產申報而醜行曝光,原因在於只申報不公示。
新唐人記者黃麗達,蕭宇採訪報導.
Property Discloser Refused
Wu Liangyu, deputy secretary of central disciplinary
committee said, the conditions for Chinese officials
to disclose their properties are immature.
Why the combating corruption property disclosure
can not be implemented in China?
Scholars think, it is the Chinese Communist Party
(CCP) that does not want to do it.
Wu Liangyu said, the two conditions, i.e., poor social
creditability and incomplete vital statistics in China,
make it impossible for the officials to disclose
their properties and ineffective for the government
to monitor and check the information.
Cheng Xiaonong (China expert) said that Shanghai』
authorities once required government employees
to disclose houses they owned, with no punishment.
This indicates, it is not that the CCP can not do it,
but rather that CCP does not want to do it.
Cheng: “Lack of statistical data for implementing
the policy is because the government does not want
to take the statistics. If the government really wants
to do it, it is in fact very simple. Using the same
determination for maintaining social stability
and the same resources for monitoring dissidents,
I do not believe it is impossible
to clearly investigate corrupt officials』 properties.”
Hong Kong based Oriental Daily commented,
Wu Liangyu indicates that it is conditional for China
to implement policy of officials』 property disclosure.
However, no country in the world can have
perfect conditions before implementing the policy.
Then why most countries, including developing
ones like Mexico and Thailand can implement
this policy unconditionally, but China cannot?
Cheng: “With China』s ID cards unified registration,
the bank deposits』 owners can easily be checked out.
The authorities are able to monitor the dissidents
through their ID cards, meaning they can monitor
anybody they want using the ID cards.
So, technically it is not difficult for the authorities.”
Oriental Daily commented that it is due to the lack
of social creditability that makes corruption rampant.
Wu Liangyu referred to social creditability
as a condition, which confuses the cause and effect
and is just an excuse for the government』s inaction.
The lack of a statistical system claim is also nonsense.
To implement the policy, only a database is needed,
where officials can report their properties directly.
This should not be difficult for China which has
technologies like the satellite and bullet train ones.
Cheng: “They are not willing to monitor the officials,
of course China does not have the related statistics.
In fact, the regime is concerned with only one thing,
i.e., the stability of its rule and officials』 privileges.
This is why they do not want to monitor officials.”
Cheng thinks countering corruption in China is fake,
because if the CCP was serious, it could have
already used the current monitoring system
to completely investigate the properties of officials.
In fact, CCP has promoted the property disclosure
policy for many years with no success at all.
Oriental Daily said, not even one corrupt official
was exposed yet due to this policy,
as CCP doesn』t publicize it even if a disclose is made.
NTD reporters Huang Lida and Xiao Yu
看下一集
【禁言博客】同足協一樣黑的證監會
【禁聞】胡佳出獄 仍受監控
【禁聞】黨員8千萬虛假 退黨大潮解體中共
【禁聞】“垃圾圍城” 魚塘變垃圾場
【禁聞】溫家寶訪歐 人權抗議如影隨形
【禁聞】“紅十字會總經理”炫富 遭圍觀
【禁聞】“群體滅絕罪”國際罪犯 現身北京
【禁聞】7.1前北京數萬人上訪 有喊打倒中共
【禁聞】中共黨慶掀紅潮 耗資萬億失民心
【禁聞】維基解密:前中共財長中臺美人計
【禁聞】國際法庭通緝卡札菲 中國民眾叫好
【禁聞論壇】大學,上還是不上?!
【禁言博客】我只為丁俊輝 李娜喝采
【禁聞】中共建黨90週年自稱“朋友遍天下”
【禁聞】黨報稱黨員先進遭轟 建黨宣傳挨批
【禁聞】圍剿“郭美美”全民要真相