【禁聞】動車事故報告與馬騁之死

【新唐人2011年8月26日訊】8月22號上午，溫州動車事故檢查組到「中國鐵路通信信號集團公司」檢查時，公司董事長馬騁突發心臟病去世。輿論普遍認為，馬騁因為壓力過大而崩潰。在此之前，下屬公司「北京全路通信信號研究設計院」發表聲明表示，願意對事故承擔責任。

據《財新網》引述馬騁朋友的話報導說，55歲的馬騁原來沒有心臟病史，卻被診斷為心臟病突發。《南方都市報》記者趕赴北大醫院，希望查看死亡病歷，遭到拒絕，負責醫生表示，“我們只能說，電視上公布的死因是正確的。”

馬騁是「通號集團」前任總經理，去年底集團改制後成為董事長。

導致7•23事故的一個主要原因，據了解是列控中心資料獲取驅動板出現軟件邏輯錯誤，致使列控中心不能即時、正確的接收資料併發送正確命令。而「通號集團」是甬臺溫線的列控設備提供商，旗下的「全路通信信號設計院」正是軟件設計單位。事故後，「通號集團」成為眾矢之的。

《廣州日報》報導，7.23事故後，「通號集團」推遲了公司上市計劃。而《21世紀經濟報導》披露，「通號集團」上下員工都接受過國務院調查組問詢，包括“馬騁也被叫去談過話”。

《每日經濟新聞》報導援引“7•23”事故調查組專家組副組長王夢恕原話說，“信號是有些問題，也不至於追尾。”。王夢恕意味深長的指出，7.23事故誘因肯定是“管理的問題大於技術的問題”。

北京學者彭定鼎對馬騁之死表示同情。

彭定鼎（北京學者）：「如果我要是他，我就不會這樣緊張了。我已經說過多少次了，關於事故，不是在於引發原因是甚麼。要點在於，當出現故障以後，一個預案，針對故障的安全預案為甚麼沒有啟動。」

《華爾街日報》報導，中共當局本週表示，已就造成兩列高速列車追尾並導致40人死亡的事故原因，得出了初步調查結果，將於9月中旬之前公布這一結果。「安全生產監督管理總局」發言人黃毅說，調查組現已初步完成了事故的技術報告，以及事故直接原因的專家組報告，下一步的工作即將進入事故責任的認定階段。

黃毅週一在接受《新華社》記者訪問時說，這起事故既暴露出信號系統設計上的缺陷，同時也反映出事故發生後，應急處置不力以及安全管理上存在的漏洞。黃毅重申這是一起可以避免的事故。

中國高速鐵路信號系統是按照歐洲標準由中國自主研發的。「中國通號集團公司」在包括尚比亞、伊朗和朝鮮在內的至少20個國家擁有合資企業。

《南都》的報導說，「通號集團」作為「高鐵大躍進」的直接受益者，2006年利潤為3億元，營業收入42億元。2008年，利潤為5.6億元，營業收入為62.1億元。2010年，公司利潤和營業收入翻兩番，利潤為12.6億元，營業收入達到120.5億元。

「通號集團」在深圳有兩個重要的軌道交通項目，一是廣深港客運專線，一個是地鐵2、3號線的信號專案。根據「通號集團」官網公布的信息顯示，深圳地鐵2號線由「中國通號」承擔總體安裝，3號線由「中國通號濟南有限公司」參與建設。

新唐人記者 秦雪 蕭宇 採訪報導

Wenzhou Train Crash & Ma Cheng』s Death

The morning of Aug. 22, when the Wenzhou train crash

inspection team arrived at the China National

Railway Signal & Communication Corporation (CRSC),

the company』s president Ma Cheng died of a heart attack.

Public opinion generally believes that Ma Cheng collapsed

under the excessive pressure.

Before that day, the corporation』s affiliated company,

Beijing National Railway Research & Design Institute

of Signal & Communication(CRSCD), said in a statement

that it was willing to take responsibility for the crash.

A Caixin.com report quoted the words of Ma Cheng』s friend

that Ma Cheng, age 55, had no previous history of heart

problems, but was diagnosed with a sudden heart attack.

A Southern Metropolitan Daily journalist went to the hospital

to see the death records but was rejected.

The doctor in charge said, "We only can say that

the cause of death announced on TV is correct."

Ma Cheng, the CRSC』s ex-general manger was appointed

president after the company』s restructuring in late 2010.

It is understood that a major cause of the 7.23 train crash

was due to program logic errors of the data acquisition board.

The train control center was thus unable to receive

real-time correct data and send the correct commands.

CRSC is the train control equipment supplier of the said

accident line.

Its affiliated company CRSCD is responsible

for the software design, and became the target of

public criticism after the Wenzhou crash accident.

Guangzhou Daily reported that after the 7.23 train crash

CRSC postponed its plan to list its stocks on an exchange.

21st Century Business Herald revealed that all of CRSC』s

employees had been questioned

by the State Council investigation team

and "Ma Cheng was also called for inquiries."

National Business Daily quoted the words of

Wang Mengshu, an accident inspection expert:

“There was something wrong with the signal,

but it unlikely went so far to cause the rear-end accident.”

Wang said meaningfully that the cause of 7.23 train crash

definitely “has more to do with management problems

than with technical problems.”

Beijing-based scholar Peng Dingding

expressed his sympathy for Ma Cheng』s death.

Peng Dingding (Beijing-based scholar):

If I were him, I wouldn』t be so nervous.

As I』ve said many times in regards to the accident,

the point is not to focus on the causes

but on the contingency plan. Why wasn』t it applied then?

Wall Street Journal reported that

the Chinese authorities said this week that

the preliminary investigation』s results had come out

and would be announced before the middle of September.

Huang Yi, spokesman for the State Production Safety

Supervision & Management Office said that

the inspection team has finished the initial technical report

on the accident and expert team』s direct cause report.

The next step is to identify what caused the crash.

Huang Yi told the Xinhua News Agency that the accident

exposed not only the signaling systems』 flaws, but also the

poor contingency management and safety management.

He reiterated that this was an avoidable accident.

China railway signal system is independently developed

and is in accordance with European standards.

CRSC』s subsidiary joint ventures are

operated in at least 20 countries

including Zambia, Iran and North Korea.

Southern Metropolitan Daily reported that CRSC is a direct

beneficiary of high-speed railway』s Great Leap Forward.

In 2006, its profit reached RMB 300 million

with revenues of RMB 4.2 billion.

In 2008, the profit was RMB 560 million with

revenues of RMB 6.21 billion.

In 2010, the Corp quadrupled profit to RMB 1.26 billion

and revenues to RMB 12.05 billion.

CRSC has contracted 2 important rail projects in Shenzhen.

One is Guangzhou-Shenzhen-Hong Kong Passenger Line

the other is the signal project for Subway Line 2 and Line 3

CRSC』s website said that the CRSC is responsible for

the overall installation of Shenzhen Subway Line 2,

and CRSC Jinan Engineering Co., Ltd. for Subway Line 3.

NTD reporters Qin Xue and Xiao Yu